Wikia

WelcomeEdit

Hi, welcome to Family Guy Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Death Has a Shadow/References page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Buckimion (Talk) 23:40, November 18, 2009

Formatting Edit

Leave the formatting alone. Quit leaving empty spaces at the bottom of the page and there is no need to move episode titles around. I will ban you if you continue. --Buckimion 13:38, November 25, 2009 (UTC)

you are mistaken with another user. There have been no format changes.

Pictures Edit

IF you are intentionally changing the pictures on pages to thumbnails please don't. Thumbnails have been removed to eliminate "vanity edits" - people from changing pictures just to have their name displayed. --Buckimion 03:08, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

You already said this on the "Wiki Activity", but message loud and clear. You either really care that much or you're just picking at straws.

And they're not "vanity edits". The same can be said about your own reverts... -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 03:26, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

You misunderstand...the thumbnails are removed to keep the credit for the pictures from showing. --Buckimion 03:34, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

And because they credit-captiony-looking things look ugly on the pages--Jack's Posse Fic 12:39, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Linking names Edit

Major characters are linked by both their commonly known first name as well as their full name. Peter and Peter Griffin both go to the same page. It is unnecessary to do this: [[Peter Griffin|Peter]]. On a side note, if a page is long, stacking the pictures is acceptable. In the case of Yoda, the page is not yet long enough to support stacking and the pictures are best placed side-by-side at the top. --Buckimion 10:23, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

Both of those ways look unprofessional. Separately speaking, linking a first name only creates a redirect and as for the placement of images, well it just looks plain bad and awkard. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 10:54, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

Apologies Edit

My apologies for snapping at you. Adding quotation marks to the titles is great and linking names where there are none if fine, although at times I question whether or not we need another link added to +2000 links to Stewie. I just get annoyed with letter-padding for name links and really can't figure out why it's necessary to flip the picture placement info around. --Buckimion 01:29, July 20, 2011 (UTC)

Don't you have some parked cars you can chase? --Buckimion 14:55, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

Whatever do you mean? -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 14:57, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

Don't you ever have anything nice to say?! -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 14:59, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

BlockEdit

You're blocking me!!? I find your personal reasons unnaccepable & irresponsible. But please, let the actual vandals take you "invaluable" time up & get their way. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 02:41, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

1 edit. Was it a bad one? -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 03:14, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Prior notice would have been more accepable & appreciated. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 03:24, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

This is outragerous! It's gone from 2 hours to 6 MONTHS! What have I done that's got you so ticked off at me? I want to know. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 05:32, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

You went from being merely a pain in my neck to stalking me across wikis just to say "gotcha." THAT is going too far. --Buckimion 14:35, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

I was not being a pain in your neck, you just don't like me. I think you blocking me over 1 measly edit because not view any of my possible other ones I may or may do. You didn't even give a legit reason, just a lame unprovoked blocking just for the sake of blocking excuse that you've dying to give me. Like I said before it's not solely your wiki, you seem to have a hard time remembering that. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 15:43, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

I'm not stalking. LOL. You're trashing your own wikis because you would rather see your own edits than mine. Now that's what I call "vanity edits". "Ad night"? Like "Commercial night"? You're so vain. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 15:53, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

I'm going to your other user pages to try & clear the air, but you don't care because you don't like me & just being unreasonble as usual. That's not "stalking". Learn the difference please. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 16:00, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Do I need to remind you of your edit to American Dad's Abraham Lincoln?

You are right only in the case that I don't like you. As far as I'm concerned, the pettiness on the majority of your edits outweighs whatever good you do manage to fix. Just because you can do something doesn't mean it is always necessary. Poking your nose into anything other than a given night's episode is asking for trouble. I will normally issue warnings but your past has demonstrated that you don't care for my advice either and proceed as you see fit, including not having the sense to just lay low for the night but to go on to American Dad and post taunting like that. Indeed, since you didn't bother to contribute anything new last night to the programs as they air I have to wonder if you even watch or just nitpick at what other's create. --Buckimion 20:17, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Should it matter to you how or when I watch it? Of course it shouldn't. Why do should I follow these nonsensical "only new episode & laying low rules". And if I choose to go to another wiki then why should that MATTER? Well it SHOULDN'T. You're abusing your admin priviledges by being biased. In fact if you would care to look at my edits at The Cleveland Show they were actual improvements, but you trashed your site by rolling them back just to spite me, and you didn't even bother to vainly correct it yourself. I also even went to said wiki to talk about it, but all you could be bothered to responsed with was that I was "stalking" you. You just didn't care to set things right. What's even more bizarre is on Adam Ant at American Dad you removed quotes, but left a link. And so what if all I do is fix grammar & spelling, is that such a bad thing? To you it obviously is. I'm sorry they're not awe-inspiring additions like yours. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 00:25, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

If you'll note, I have returned most of the pages back...damn me for knowing when something DOES look better. I am contemplating removing your block here so you may continue but please have the courtesy not to start on side projects on Sunday nights when new episodes air. --Buckimion 00:32, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed, but please take in account different time-zones because I'm from the UK. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 00:39, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

Ok, then no edits between midnight to 4am Mondays. :D --Buckimion 00:42, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

Friendly advice Edit

Let me handle rule communication and policy. I realize you're only wanting to help, but that comes close to taunting someone which I have blocked people for. --Buckimion 01:41, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

Hmm? Yeah, sure. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible 01:43, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

Ginger Gonzaga Edit

I am not about to jump down your throat but I am curious what you meant by making some changes? I could probably agree to replacing Ginger with Gonzaga but I think the beginning flows better, at least for now. Should she become an "A" list star I could probably agree to an overhaul, but my own experience is that this holds down what is usually silly additions for minor roles. --Buckimion (talk) 22:51, November 14, 2012 (UTC)

Well, basically the changes Scott made I found completely acceptable. Having said that I can see both sides so I would find it a tad annoying after creating a page having someone else altering the whole line to suit themselves. Of course I like think I know where I stand so I wouldn't of done what Scott did even if I was adding a link aswell because I know you don't like it. I hope I've been helpful enough to your question. I'd just like to add that I personally wouldn't use a real person's name because we don't know these people and seems unprofessional to do so. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 23:27, November 14, 2012 (UTC)

I just use people's handles myself. Most of the time that seems impersonal enough. :) I do agree that if it had started one way I usually leave that part alone. Jason and I have different styles of writing lyrics and we've reached an agreement to leave each other's styles alone depending on who writes the page to begin with. I didn't say boo about adding links earlier, but it seemed like you did want an opinion on Nicole Richie and the picture just got too fuzzy at the larger size. --Buckimion (talk) 23:34, November 14, 2012 (UTC)

It sounds kind of funny when I read it now, but I meant their first name. About Nicole Richie though, it looked as if the page hadn't been updated because they did make-up unless they had another falling out. Usually images are made as big as possible right upto 300px, obviously I knew it wasn't going to be the same with that, but I thought it could be a bit bigger. I wasn't going to argue about you reverting back to the original size though. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 23:47, November 14, 2012 (UTC)